brianpuccio.net

it's dot com

NASA's Phoenix Finds Ice On Mars

Date: Friday, June 20, 2008 - 7:04am
Keywords: space, NASA, mars, phoenix
Links:


"It must be ice," said Phoenix Principal Investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona, Tucson. "These little clumps completely disappearing over the course of a few days, that is perfect evidence that it's ice. There had been some question whether the bright material was salt. Salt can't do that."

The chunks were left at the bottom of a trench informally called "Dodo-Goldilocks" when Phoenix's Robotic Arm enlarged that trench on June 15, during the 20th Martian day, or sol, since landing. Several were gone when Phoenix looked at the trench early today, on Sol 24.

It could be something else, but ice sounds like a pretty good guess.

Phoenix Has Landed On Mars

Date: Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 11:58pm
Keywords: space, NASA, mars, phoenix
Links:


NASA's Phoenix spacecraft landed in the northern polar region of Mars today to begin three months of examining a site chosen for its likelihood of having frozen water within reach of the lander's robotic arm.

Radio signals received at 4:53:44 p.m. Pacific Time (7:53:44 p.m. Eastern Time) confirmed the Phoenix Mars Lander had survived its difficult final descent and touchdown 15 minutes earlier. The signals took that long to travel from Mars to Earth at the speed of light.

Hooray!

NASA Announces Ten Missions Under Evaluation For 2008

Date: Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 3:22pm
Keywords: space, NASA, education and science as a social priority, astrophysics, United States
Links:


Senior Review and rankings for the ten missions under evaluation for NASA Astrophysics in 2008 have been published.

  1. Swift
  2. Chandra
  3. GALEX
  4. Suzaku
  5. (Warm) Spitzer
  6. WMAP
  7. XMM
  8. INTEGRAL
  9. RXTE
  10. Gravity Probe-B

Bottom line here is that NASA funds are too tight, so some operating missions are being reviewed for descoping or shut down.

Researcher's Latest Experiment Further Validates General Relativity

Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 - 8:01pm
Keywords: space, relativity, astrophysics
Links:


The new test of general relativity concerns a distant galactic core or quasar called OJ287, which is known to emit a pair of bright optical bursts every 12 years or so. In 1988, Valtonen and others suggested that this emission is powered by a primary black hole 18 billion times more massive than the Sun, around which orbits a second black hole some 200 times lighter. In such a binary system, the lighter object passes through matter in the accretion disk of the primary black hole twice per orbit, releasing a burst of energy each time it does so.

By modelling such a system, researchers could then put general relativity to the test by predicting when the next burst should occur. At the time, the next major bursts (which were due in the mid 1990s) could only be predicted with an accuracy of a few weeks, which was too vague to test general relativistic effects. But early last year, based on refined models and years spent monitoring OJ287, Valtonen and others were able to predict the date on which the next bright pulse should appear: 13 September 2007, give or take a day or two.

To have any hope of detecting the pulse, more than 25 astronomers from 10 countries had to work together. This is because in September OJ287 rises in the east just before sunrise, and is therefore only visible at any one location on Earth for about 30 minutes before the sky becomes too bright. By starting observations in Japan, followed by China, Europe and ending in the Canary Islands, observers were able to follow the sunrise westward around the globe and maximise observing time. In total, about 100 measurements were made between 4 September and 20 October, some of which by amateur astronomers.

Venus Used To Be Like Earth

Date: Friday, April 4, 2008 - 8:52am
Keywords: space, esa
Links:


The first results from ESA’s Venus Express give weight to the popular theory that our planetary twin once had a similar climate to Earth’s, only for it to evolve into the hell-like place it is today. Among the results is proof that Venus has been steadily losing water as the result of a runaway greenhouse effect, and the first concrete piece of evidence that the planet is home to bursts of high-altitude lightning.

Formed at roughly the same time, orbiting closer than any two Solar System planets and possessing the same radius to within 5%, it is hardly surprising that Earth and Venus are often referred to as twins. But Venus’s barren surface coupled with temperatures reaching 450°C — higher even than Mercury — makes its present climate a far cry from cool, wet Earth.

NASA Suggests A One Person, One Way Mission To Mars

Date: Sunday, March 9, 2008 - 3:04pm
Keywords: space, NASA, mars, jim mclane
Links:


Will humans ever really go to Mars? Let's face it, the obstacles are quite daunting. Not only are there numerous, difficult, technical issues to overcome, but the political will and perseverance of any one nation to undertake such an arduous task just can't be counted on. However, one former NASA engineer believes a human mission to Mars is quite doable, and such an event would unify the world as never before. But Jim McLane's proposal includes a couple of major caveats: the trip to Mars should be one-way, and have a crew of only one person.

Lovell Telescope To Be Taken Offline

Date: Thursday, March 6, 2008 - 8:22pm
Keywords: space, astronomy, britain, lovell telescope
Links:


Even more bad news under the save astronomy banner: The Times is running a story today suggesting that the famous telescope at Jodrell Bank faces closure.

I'd gathered from the list of possible cuts on the Save Astronomy website that Merlin was under threat but I hadn't even considered the idea that this might mean that the Lovell Telescope itself would be under threat.

This whole STFC nonsense was depressing to start with, it's almost impossible for me to find the right word to describe my mood now.
Is this it? Has this country given up on physics and astronomy? Has this government now decided that it's really not worth the time or money? I disagree. I'd try and say why I disagree but there's little point when Nigel Hawkes at The Times has done a far better job...

Why Spend So Much More Money To "Shoot Down" Something That Is Coming Down Anyhow?

Date: Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 11:49am
Keywords: space, United States
Links:


The Pentagon says it has to shoot down a malfunctioning spy satellite because of the threat of a toxic gas cloud. Space security experts are calling the rationale highly unlikely. 'Having the US government spend millions of dollars to destroy a billion-dollar failure to save zero lives is comedic gold,' one tells DANGER ROOM.

Yesterday, Deputy National Security Advisor James Jeffrey said the satellite's tank full of hydrazine rocket propellant was the main reason the military was planning to blast the orbiter. There's a small but real risk that the hydrazine tank could rupture, releasing a 'toxic gas' over a 'populated area,' causing a 'risk to human life.'

They go into some interesting theories, but I think that the largest concern is that they simply don't want this satellite to crashland someplace where an unallied government or other faction (for lack of a better term) will be able to recover and potentially see what the US is up to and capable (or even not capable) of from a technology point of view.

HobbySpace

Date: Sunday, December 2, 2007 - 9:41am
Keywords: space
Links:


HobbySpace hosts an exhaustive collection of information and links about space-related hobbies, including amateur astronomy, satellite design, and rocketry for both beginners and experts.

What Do I Want To Be When I Grow Up?

Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 12:43am
Keywords: me, space, physics, NASA, education and science as a social priority, Brian Greene
Links:


So I'm all set for school next semester. You know, that bachelors of science in physics that I've been working on for the past three years, I'm going to try to finish it. Partially because I think I'll get further in life with a degree than without, partially because I think a lot of people won't view me the same without one and partially because I'd like to have a job that I love and that excites me.

But it seems the more I read, the more I don't know what I'm going to do with this. For the past year, I was in a bit of a funk, and wasn't quite sure I loved it as much as I used to. I'm reading Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe and a few other books and liking it a lot. But what about when I graduate? What's the job market look like? Well, I'e been reading a lot of the Uncertain Principles blog (physics, politics, pop culture, hooray) and a few entries stand out. The Job Hunt goes on to say, in part:

I don't know how it is in other fields, but in math/physics, this generally involves three to four letters of recommendation, a CV, a research statement, sometimes a teaching statement and maybe an annotated bibliography. In high energy physics, we have the Theoretical Particle Physics Job Rumor Mill run by the now nonymous John Terning. In addition to listing offers and educated guesses at short lists, it also serves as a nice clearinghouse of positions. SPIRES, the APS, Physics Today and I'm sure many others offer job listings, too.

This is one situation where the math world definitely has the physics world beat, however. The AMS runs a site called MathJobs which is completely brilliant. There's a searchable database of jobs which I've configured to send me newly listed relevant offers daily. You can upload all the relevant documentation, and it will automatically send an e-mail to your recommenders so that they can upload their letters. The application then becomes a simple matter of ensuring that the relevant files are available and clicking away. It's easy, efficient, and it saves countless manila envelopes.

The Academic Physics Job Market goes on about how "the academic job market in physics sucks." Which, given the rest of the post, seems accurate. The Academic Physics Job Market, Part 2 goes on a bit more with some statistics as to "the actual suckitude of the job market in physics."

Is this what I'm going to bust my ass for? I feel like giving up already. OK, so maybe I should just forget about getting a research career and just teach at my local community college? Or maybe I should just leave academia all together? I mean, I could go work for NASA, Goddard is right in the city, which is what I should aim for, I guess, if I wanted to work for NASA. I don't feel like moving all around the country, even if I was hired to do something a little better than mop the floors at JPL.

I just don't know what I'm doing, but I guess I should at least finish the bachelors degree and then think if I want to pursue more school or not. There's someone my mom knows personally who I want to go talk to because I know that speaking to my professors about this will give me information from an academic slant. I want to see all of the points of view and then decide.

Syndicate

Syndicate content

User login