brianpuccio.net

it's dot com

Balder And Dash

Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 1:32pm
George Bush, political doublespeak, state of the union

We tried to do a live blog of the State of the Union address at the Michigan Messenger, but had some technical difficulties. As always when listening to such speeches, I am reminded of HL Mencken's brilliant description of the rhetoric of Warren Harding. It applies just as perfectly to all such speeches today:

It reminds me of a string of wet sponges; it reminds me of tattered washing on the line; it reminds me of stale bean soup, of college yells, of dogs barking idiotically through endless nights. It is so bad that a sort of grandeur creeps into it. It drags itself out of the dark abysm of pish, and crawls insanely up the top most pinnacle of posh. It is rumble and bumble. It is flap and doodle. It is balder and dash.

Brits Consider War On Terror Passe

Monday, December 31, 2007, 2:01pm
war on terror, political doublespeak, propoganda, britain

The words "war on terror" will no longer be used by the British government to describe attacks on the public, the country's chief prosecutor said Dec. 27.

Finding Orwell In Burma

As soon as the protests had been violently quashed by the army, the regime set about making everything look normal again. At the UN General Assembly, the Burmese junta's Foreign Minister, Nyan Win, even went so far as to declare, "Normalcy has now returned to Myanmar [Burma]."

But Rangoon felt to me like a movie set. I imagined an invisible director ordering a cluster of fruit vendors to set up their stalls at the edge of a market, calling for a crowd of pedestrians to surge across a busy street, and hanging billboard advertisements for the latest cinema releases.

On my first day in Rangoon I telephoned an old friend who had a merry greeting: "Welcome to my wonderful country where nothing has just happened!" Later that same day I bumped into another friend who was visibly agitated by events: "Everyone is just pretending," she told me.

Things might look normal on the surface but, in the diary I kept while I was there, the adjectives I used to describe the moods of the various people I spoke to are repeated over and over again: angry, scared, depressed, angry, scared, depressed, angry, scared, depressed...

In order to solidify the crackdown, the regime's lackeys and informers are infiltrating teashops, schools, monasteries -- anywhere where people gather. As a result, what little trust existed before the recent protests took place is being systematically broken down.

What A Bleak Future

All members of the Inner Party believe in this coming conquest as an article of faith. It is to be achieved either by gradually acquiring more and more territory and so building up an overwhelming preponderance of power, or by the discovery of some new and unanswerable weapon. The search for new weapons continues unceasingly, and is one of the very few remaining activities in which the inventive or speculative type of mind can find any outlet. In Oceania at the present day, Science, in the old sense, has almost ceased to exist. In Newspeak there is no word for 'Science'. The empirical method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And even technological progress only happens when its products can in some way be used for the diminution of human liberty. In all the useful arts the world is either standing still or going backwards. The fields are cultivated with horse-ploughs while books are written by machinery. But in matters of vital importance--meaning, in effect, war and police espionage--the empirical approach is still encouraged, or at least tolerated. The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought. There are therefore two great problems which the Party is concerned to solve. One is how to discover, against his will, what another human being is thinking, and the other is how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand. In so far as scientific research still continues, this is its subject matter. The scientist of today is either a mixture of psychologist and inquisitor, studying with real ordinary minuteness the meaning of facial expressions, gestures, and tones of voice, and testing the truth-producing effects of drugs, shock therapy, hypnosis, and physical torture; or he is chemist, physicist, or biologist concerned only with such branches of his special subject as are relevant to the taking of life. In the vast laboratories of the Ministry of Peace, and in the experimental stations hidden in the Brazilian forests, or in the Australian desert, or on lost islands of the Antarctic, the teams of experts are indefatigably at work. Some are concerned simply with planning the logistics of future wars; others devise larger and larger rocket bombs, more and more powerful explosives, and more and more impenetrable armour-plating; others search for new and deadlier gases, or for soluble poisons capable of being produced in such quantities as to destroy the vegetation of whole continents, or for breeds of disease germs immunized against all possible antibodies; others strive to produce a vehicle that shall bore its way under the soil like a submarine under the water, or an aeroplane as independent of its base as a sailing-ship; others explore even remoter possibilities such as focusing the sun's rays through lenses suspended thousands of kilometres away in space, or producing artificial earthquakes and tidal waves by tapping the heat at the earth's centre.

The New Flip Flopper

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 8:30am
war on terror, George Bush, Kohn Kerry, political doublespeak, WMD

During the campaigns for the 2004 presidential election, John Kerry was labeled a flip flopper:

I could list more, but I'm sure you can google for more. Anyhow, a lot of people who wanted to see George W. Bush back in the Whitehouse jumped on the flip flop bandwagon. But let's look at some current flip flopping from none other then W himself.

On March 19, 2003, Bush announced:

Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.

On May 29, 2003, he makes another statement:

We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories.For those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them.

But while in Pennsylvania on September 9, 2004, Bush flip flops:

I recognize we didn't find the stockpiles [of weapons] we all thought were there.

Seems that not only was he sure they were there, he was sure that the weapons were found. How can you find something that doesn't exist?

Now Bush no longer thinks that he is fighting a war on terror, rather, it is a struggle against violent extremism. Why? Because mentally, people think of wars having winners and losers. This entire affair in the Middle East isn't looking so good and its hard to hide the dead bodies that come back to the country every day. But a struggle on the other hand, there's no clear cut win and lose mental picture. Instead, you imagine a long drawn out series of conflicts. A back and forth sort of thing. This war on terror won't be over for another decade, probably longer. Something like one third of the country thinks that the United States is winning the war on terror, meaning that the majority of the country either thinks they are losing (if you count a loss of civil liberties as terrorists winning, then they are right) and don't have enough information to make the decision (if you count a government not telling you what you feel you have the right to know as terrorists winning, then they are right as well).

That being said, I haven't seen many people associate the term flip flop with Bush, however, some have:

Syndicate

Syndicate content

User login